Provider type · HHS OIG LEIE · August 2026

OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE

According to the HHS Office of Inspector General LEIE extract, federal healthcare-program exclusions for an OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE category show volume rank, reason mix, and state concentration, not a patient-safety grade.

15
Federal exclusions
0.0%
Share of all LEIE
#65
Of 85 provider types
TX
6 rows in TX

The short answer

Conviction: Program-Related Crime is the statutory reason on 6 of 15 LEIE rows tagged to OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE (40%).

The live HHS OIG List of Excluded Individuals/Entities lists 15 exclusions tagged to OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE (0.0% of tracked rows). Largest state concentration: TX (6 rows). Volume tracks federal billing exposure and audit pathways, not a misconduct rate inside the specialty. Dataset vintage: August 2026.

Thin LEIE volume band

OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE in the thin-volume third

15 exclusions place OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE in the bottom third by volume among 85 active provider types. Leading statutory reason: Conviction: Program-Related Crime (6, 40% of the category). TX, LA, WI account for the largest share of OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE exclusions on record.

Thin volume (15 rows) can mean fewer federal billers, less audit exposure, or genuinely lower violation rates ; TX still concentrates 40% of this sparse book. LEIE alone cannot separate those causes.

Source: HHS OIG List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE) · PlainDiscipline specialty extract · August 2026 · Methodology.

How 15 OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE LEIE rows split by authority family

Exclusive family rollup of statutory headings for this provider type, not the raw reason RankTable below.

OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE exclusion reasons

Counts from the live HHS OIG LEIE extract for this provider type.

0%10%Equal-share (1.2%)1%0%
OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE is 0.0% of tracked LEIE rows; equal-share across 85 categories would be 1.2%. Volume tracks federal billing exposure, not a misconduct rate.

Top states - TX leads OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE (40%)

LEIE rows tied to this provider type, not a patient-safety grade.

#StateLEIE rows
1TexasTX6
2LouisianaLA2
3WisconsinWI1
4New YorkNY1
5NevadaNV1
6MississippiMS1
7MissouriMO1
8FloridaFL1
9CaliforniaCA1

Read with OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE: How medical boards investigate · All provider types

Nationwide peers near OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE's thin volume

Cross-category peers matched on federal exclusion volume and share of the LEIE corpus, not the state concentration table above.

Similar exclusion volume

Similar share of all LEIE exclusions

Recent Federal Exclusions - OPTOMETRIC PRACTICE

Name State Reason Date
Visionary Optics of Jamaica Av NY Exclusion or Debarment by Federal Agency 2010-01-20
Ema Eyewear, INC FL Entity Controlled by Sanctioned Individual 2006-10-19
American Home Vision MO Fraud, Kickbacks, or Prohibited Activities 2004-03-15
Lake Tahoe Eyecare NV Entity Controlled by Sanctioned Individual 2000-04-20
Dr Nevins' Eyeworld TX Entity Controlled by Sanctioned Individual 1997-01-29
Home Bound Eyecare TX Conviction: Program-Related Crime (Alt) 1995-02-23
Red River Eye Associates TX Conviction: Program-Related Crime (Alt) 1994-12-14
Cbt & Associates LA Conviction: Program-Related Crime 1989-11-20
Central City Optical LA Conviction: Program-Related Crime 1989-11-20
Shackelford Vision Center MS Conviction: Program-Related Crime 1989-10-19

Source: HHS OIG LEIE

Source: HHS OIG List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE) Federal exclusion data from the HHS Office of Inspector General (LEIE). Provider-type categories are as recorded in the LEIE dataset. This information is for educational purposes only and does not constitute medical or legal advice